GeForce 930A vs Radeon R7 M275DX

Radeon R7 M260 Radeon R7 M260DX Radeon R7 M260X Radeon R7 M265 Radeon R7 M265DX Radeon R7 M270 Radeon R7 M270DX Radeon R7 M275DX
VS
830A 830M 840A 840M 845M 920MX 930A 930M 930MX 940A 940M MX130

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M275DX and GeForce 930A, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M275DX
2014
2.88
+1.8%

R7 M275DX outperforms 930A by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 M275DX R7 M275DX
GeForce 930A GeForce 930A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking754761
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.78
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameno dataGM108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896384
Core clock speedno data928 MHz
Boost clock speedno data941 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data33 Watt
Texture fill rateno data22.58
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7227 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1001 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16.02 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Fortnite 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Valorant 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Fortnite 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Valorant 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Valorant 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how R7 M275DX and GeForce 930A compete in popular games:

  • R7 M275DX is 14% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.88 2.83
Recency 4 June 2014 13 March 2015

R7 M275DX has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score.

GeForce 930A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R7 M275DX and GeForce 930A.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
Radeon R7 M275DX
NVIDIA GeForce 930A
GeForce 930A
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
GeForce 930MX GeForce 930MX
GeForce 930A GeForce 930A
vs
Iris Graphics 540 Iris Graphics 540
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
GTX 560M GeForce GTX 560M
GT 635M NVIDIA GT 635M
vs
HD 6610M 6610M
GT 735M NVIDIA GT 735M
vs
HD 6625M 6625M
GT 640M NVIDIA GT 640M
vs
HD 6630M Mac Edition 6630M Mac Edition
GTX 675MX NVIDIA GTX 675MX
vs
HD 6970M Rebrand 6970M Rebrand
GT 735M NVIDIA GT 735M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5570 Radeon HD 5570
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
vs
GeForce 945A 945A
RX 550 Mobile AMD RX 550 Mobile
vs
GTX 950A 950A
R9 M470 AMD R9 M470
vs
GTX 950M Mac Edition 950M Mac Edition
R9 M290X AMD R9 M290X
vs
GTX 960A 960A
HD 6970M AMD HD 6970M
vs
GTX 860M OEM 860M OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M275DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 18 votes

Rate GeForce 930A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M275DX or GeForce 930A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.