Radeon R7 M275DX vs GeForce MX130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX130 and Radeon R7 M275DX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX130
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.72
+41.7%

MX130 outperforms R7 M275DX by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking653745
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.86no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code nameGM108no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed1122 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1242 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate29.81no data
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1253 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX130 4.72
+41.7%
R7 M275DX 3.33

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX130 2875
R7 M275DX 3553
+23.6%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX130 11968
+44%
R7 M275DX 8309

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX130 2345
+21.4%
R7 M275DX 1932

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX130 13610
+22%
R7 M275DX 11160

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX130 170596
+97.6%
R7 M275DX 86346

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−33.3%
24
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−75%
7−8
+75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 8
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 14
+100%
7−8
−100%
Fortnite 32
+88.2%
16−18
−88.2%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Valorant 55−60
+18.8%
45−50
−18.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Counter-Strike 2 3
−233%
10−11
+233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+66%
47
−66%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Dota 2 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Fortnite 24
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 3
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Valorant 55−60
+18.8%
45−50
−18.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Dota 2 28
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Far Cry 5 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Valorant 55−60
+18.8%
45−50
−18.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+47.8%
21−24
−47.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Valorant 45−50
+58.1%
30−35
−58.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GeForce MX130 and R7 M275DX compete in popular games:

  • R7 M275DX is 33% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX130 is 200% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M275DX is 233% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX130 is ahead in 50 tests (82%)
  • R7 M275DX is ahead in 6 tests (10%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.72 3.33
Recency 17 November 2017 4 June 2014

GeForce MX130 has a 41.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The GeForce MX130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M275DX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
Radeon R7 M275DX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2307 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M275DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX130 or Radeon R7 M275DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.