UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Radeon R7 M265DX

Aggregate performance score

R7 M265DX
2014
1.29

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms Radeon R7 M265DX by a whopping 252% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking995619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2017)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTopazTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2014 (9 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38448
Core clock speed780 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed940 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt
Texture fill rate22.56no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M265DX and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−325%
17
+325%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−267%
11
+267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−300%
12
+300%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Hitman 3 2−3
−400%
10
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−286%
27
+286%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−320%
21
+320%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 3−4
Battlefield 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Hitman 3 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−325%
17
+325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−275%
15
+275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−300%
12
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−300%
16
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−300%
8
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Hitman 3 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 2−3

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 3−4
Hitman 3 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 3−4
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 3−4
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

This is how R7 M265DX and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 325% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 4.54
Recency 12 October 2014 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M265DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M265DX is a desktop card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
Radeon R7 M265DX
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 425 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.