UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs Radeon R7 M265DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M260 M260DX M260X M265 M265DX M270 M270DX M275DX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M265DX and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M265DX
2014
1.13

Graphics 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms R7 M265DX by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 M265DX R7 M265DX
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1091909
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTopazTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 October 2014 (10 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed925 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed940 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Texture fill rate22.56no data
Floating-point processing power0.7219 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−83.3%
11
+83.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10
+0%
10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9
+0%
9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5
+0%
5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 7
+0%
7
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+0%
9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how R7 M265DX and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 83% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.13 2.00
Recency 12 October 2014 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 77% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M265DX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
Radeon R7 M265DX
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M265DX Radeon R7 M265DX
vs
GTS 150M GeForce GTS 150M
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
R7 M265DX Radeon R7 M265DX
vs
GeForce 615 GeForce 615
R7 M265DX AMD R7 M265DX
vs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
R7 M265DX AMD R7 M265DX
vs
UHD Graphics G1 G1
R7 M265DX AMD R7 M265DX
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Xe G4 48EUs
R7 M265DX AMD R7 M265DX
vs
UHD Graphics G4 G4
R7 M265DX AMD R7 M265DX
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs Xe 750 32EUs
R7 M270DX AMD R7 M270DX
vs
Jetson Xavier NX 8 GB Xavier NX 8 GB
R7 M270DX AMD R7 M270DX
vs
Jetson AGX Xavier 32 GB AGX Xavier 32 GB
GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
vs
GTX 1070 GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X
GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X NVIDIA GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
vs
RX 5300M 5300M
R8 M535DX AMD R8 M535DX
vs
Tesla C1080 C1080

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 390 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M265DX or UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.