GeForce 8200M G vs Radeon R7 M265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M265 and GeForce 8200M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M265
2014
4 GB DDR3
1.28
+700%

R7 M265 outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10501462
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)no data
GPU code nameTopazMCP77MV MCP79MVL
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date20 May 2014 (11 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3848
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Texture fill rate23.52no data
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x8no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1110
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M265 1.28
+700%
8200M G 0.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M265 536
+725%
8200M G 65

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
God of War 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
God of War 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
God of War 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
God of War 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Valorant 5−6 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
God of War 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how R7 M265 and 8200M G compete in popular games:

  • R7 M265 is 1300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M265 is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 M265 is ahead in 23 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 0.16
Recency 20 May 2014 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm

R7 M265 has a 700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 M265 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M265
Radeon R7 M265
NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 116 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 38 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M265 or GeForce 8200M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.