Radeon R7 M270DX vs GeForce 8200M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8200M G and Radeon R7 M270DX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8200M G
2008
0.16

R7 M270DX outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 1331% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1465882
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameMCP77MV MCP79MVLTopaz
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)11 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8384
Core clock speed400 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data940 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data22.56
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7219 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8200M G 0.16
R7 M270DX 2.29
+1331%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8200M G 65
R7 M270DX 961
+1378%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
God of War 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
God of War 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Valorant 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
God of War 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Valorant 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
God of War 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Valorant 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1300%
210−220
+1300%
Valorant 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 2.29
Recency 3 June 2008 11 June 2014
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm

R7 M270DX has a 1331.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 M270DX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G
AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
Radeon R7 M270DX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 38 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M270DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G or Radeon R7 M270DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.