GeForce 9700M GTS vs Radeon R7 M260
Aggregated performance score
Radeon R7 M260 outperforms GeForce 9700M GTS by 78% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 993 | 1123 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.04 | 0.01 |
Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | G9x (2007−2010) |
GPU code name | Opal Pro / Mars | NB9E-GS |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 January 2014 (10 years old) | 15 July 2008 (15 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | no data |
Current price | $430 (0.5x MSRP) | $230 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
R7 M260 has 300% better value for money than 9700M GTS.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 48 |
CUDA cores | no data | 48 |
Compute units | 6 | no data |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 530 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 505 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 60 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 23.52 | 12.72 |
Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | 127.2 gflops |
Gigaflops | no data | 180 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon R7 M260 and GeForce 9700M GTS compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | - | no data |
Enduro | - | no data |
FreeSync | 1 | no data |
HD3D | + | no data |
PowerTune | + | no data |
DualGraphics | 1 | no data |
TrueAudio | - | no data |
ZeroCore | + | no data |
Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | no data | N/A |
Mantle | + | no data |
CUDA | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon R7 M260 outperforms GeForce 9700M GTS by 78% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Radeon R7 M260 outperforms GeForce 9700M GTS by 79% in Passmark.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Radeon R7 M260 outperforms GeForce 9700M GTS by 92% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 13
+85.7%
| 7−8
−85.7%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how R7 M260 and 9700M GTS compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- R7 M260 is 85.7% faster than 9700M GTS
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M260 is 100% faster than the 9700M GTS.
All in all, in popular games:
- R7 M260 is ahead in 15 tests (60%)
- there's a draw in 10 tests (40%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.28 | 0.72 |
Recency | 7 January 2014 | 15 July 2008 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
The Radeon R7 M260 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9700M GTS in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.