UHD Graphics 920 vs Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking897not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.02no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2016)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt15 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width64/128 Bitno data
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12.0 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

R7 (Bristol Ridge) has 25% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 920, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) and UHD Graphics 920. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 920 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Intel UHD Graphics 920
UHD Graphics 920

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 42 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 75 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.