Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs R7 (Bristol Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

R7 (Bristol Ridge)
2016
12 Watt
1.80

AI PRO R9700 outperforms R7 (Bristol Ridge) by a whopping 3837% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking95117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.0517.99
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2016)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124096
Core clock speedno data1660 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data747.5
Floating-point processing powerno data47.84 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1.80
AI PRO R9700 70.86
+3837%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 754
AI PRO R9700 29693
+3838%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−3829%
550−600
+3829%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3757%
270−280
+3757%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Fortnite 7−8
−3757%
270−280
+3757%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−3400%
350−400
+3400%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3757%
270−280
+3757%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
Valorant 35−40
−3716%
1450−1500
+3716%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−3716%
1450−1500
+3716%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Dota 2 16
−3650%
600−650
+3650%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Fortnite 7−8
−3757%
270−280
+3757%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−3400%
350−400
+3400%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3757%
270−280
+3757%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Valorant 35−40
−3716%
1450−1500
+3716%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Dota 2 14
−3829%
550−600
+3829%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−3400%
350−400
+3400%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3757%
270−280
+3757%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Valorant 35−40
−3716%
1450−1500
+3716%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−3757%
270−280
+3757%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−3746%
500−550
+3746%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−3789%
700−750
+3789%
Valorant 12−14
−3650%
450−500
+3650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−3650%
600−650
+3650%
Valorant 9−10
−3789%
350−400
+3789%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

This is how R7 (Bristol Ridge) and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 3829% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 70.86
Recency 1 June 2016 23 July 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 300 Watt

R7 (Bristol Ridge) has 2400% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 3836.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.