Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon R7 A265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Bristol Ridge) (Carrizo) (Kaveri) A265 A360 M260 M260DX M260X M265 M265DX M270 M270DX M275DX M340 M350 M350 2GB M360 M365X M370 M380 M440 M445 M460 M465 M465X Mobile Graphics
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 A265 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 A265
2014
2 GB DDR3
2.37

T500 Mobile outperforms R7 A265 by a whopping 248% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 A265 R7 A265
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking888547
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data35.16
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameOpalTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 January 2014 (11 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed725 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors950 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate19.8094.92
Floating-point processing power0.6336 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2456
L1 Cache96 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−260%
36
+260%
1440p4−5
−275%
15
+275%
4K4−5
−325%
17
+325%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how R7 A265 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 260% faster in 1080p
  • T500 Mobile is 275% faster in 1440p
  • T500 Mobile is 325% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.37 8.24
Recency 9 January 2014 2 December 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

T500 Mobile has a 247.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 A265 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 A265 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 A265
Radeon R7 A265
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 A265 Radeon R7 A265
vs
HD 8690M Radeon HD 8690M
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
R7 A265 Radeon R7 A265
vs
GeForce 830M GeForce 830M
HD 8530M AMD HD 8530M
vs
9300M GS GDDR3 9300M GS GDDR3
R5 M240 Rebrand AMD R5 M240 Rebrand
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q 1050 3 GB Max-Q
R5 M240 Rebrand AMD R5 M240 Rebrand
vs
RTX 6000 Mobile 6000 Mobile
R5 M240 Rebrand AMD R5 M240 Rebrand
vs
Radeon 740M 740M
R7 A265 AMD R7 A265
vs
T2000 Mobile T2000 Mobile
R7 A265 AMD R7 A265
vs
RX 6500M 6500M
R5 A230 AMD R5 A230
vs
L20
PlayStation 4 GPU AMD 4 GPU
vs
RTX 5080 5080
Xbox One GPU AMD One GPU
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile 3050 Mobile
Xbox One GPU AMD One GPU
vs
RTX 4070 Ti 4070 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 A265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 113 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 A265 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.