NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

Place in performance ranking	784	57
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.06	10.04
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Opal	TU102
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	9 January 2014 (10 years old)	13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$6,299
Current price	$324	$3083 (0.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 6000 has 16633% better value for money than R7 A265.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	4608
Core clock speed	725 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	825 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	19.80	509.8
Floating-point performance	633.6 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	672.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 A265 2.56

RTX 6000 48.72
+1803%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon R7 A265 by 1803% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 A265 993

RTX 6000 18872
+1801%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon R7 A265 by 1801% in Passmark.