ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs Radeon R7 A265

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking822not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)R300 (2005−2008)
GPU code nameOpalRV380
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2014 (10 years ago)2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed725 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rate19.801.000
Floating-point processing power0.6336 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x1
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz406 MBps
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s6.496 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VHDCI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

R7 A265 has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 A265 and FireMV 2400 PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 A265 is a notebook card while FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 A265
Radeon R7 A265
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 A265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.