GMA 500 vs Radeon R7 A265

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking820not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)PowerVR SGX535 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameOpalPoulsbo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2014 (10 years ago)2 March 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Core clock speed725 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate19.800.8
Floating-point processing power0.6336 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.1
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2014 2 March 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

R7 A265 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 A265 and GMA 500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 A265
Radeon R7 A265
Intel GMA 500
GMA 500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R7 A265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 15 votes

Rate GMA 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.