GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
2014
3.04

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by a whopping 514% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking771296
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Power efficiencyno data28.45
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameKaveri SpectreGA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 January 2014 (10 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed720 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data94.53
Floating-point processing powerno data6.05 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 3.04
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.68
+514%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 2302
RTX 2050 Mobile 12495
+443%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1616
RTX 2050 Mobile 8965
+455%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 10341
RTX 2050 Mobile 58257
+463%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−133%
42
+133%
1440p5−6
−580%
34
+580%
4K4−5
−525%
25
+525%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−717%
49
+717%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−367%
40−45
+367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4100%
42
+4100%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1120%
60−65
+1120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−600%
42
+600%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−633%
40−45
+633%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−631%
110−120
+631%
Hitman 3 8−9
−450%
44
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−296%
90−95
+296%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1500%
60−65
+1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−369%
60−65
+369%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−126%
85−90
+126%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−367%
40−45
+367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2000%
21
+2000%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1120%
60−65
+1120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30
+400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−633%
40−45
+633%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−631%
110−120
+631%
Hitman 3 8−9
−438%
43
+438%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−296%
90−95
+296%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1500%
60−65
+1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−377%
62
+377%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
−55.6%
40−45
+55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−126%
85−90
+126%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−367%
40−45
+367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−600%
7
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−317%
25
+317%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−633%
40−45
+633%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−631%
110−120
+631%
Hitman 3 8−9
−388%
39
+388%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−296%
90−95
+296%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−323%
55
+323%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−450%
33
+450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+117%
18
−117%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−620%
35−40
+620%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−633%
21−24
+633%
Hitman 3 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−375%
35−40
+375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−517%
110−120
+517%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−417%
30−35
+417%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+0%
47
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 133% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 580% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 525% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is 117% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 4100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (85%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.04 18.68
Recency 14 January 2014 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 514.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 14 votes

Rate Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2198 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.