ATI FireGL V3600 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking826not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameKaveri SpectreRV630
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 January 2014 (11 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512120
Core clock speed720 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data73 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.144 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 January 2014 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and FireGL V3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V3600 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
ATI FireGL V3600
FireGL V3600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 16 votes

Rate Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) or FireGL V3600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.