Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand vs HD 7660D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1083not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameDevastatorWhistler
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)1 July 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384480
Core clock speed800 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2014.40
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2424
L1 Cacheno data48 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 1 July 2012
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 20 Watt

HD 7660D has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7670M Rebrand, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7660D and Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7660D is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Radeon HD 7660D
AMD Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand
Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 144 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 17 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7660D or Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.