RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Radeon R7 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 370 with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

R7 370
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 110 Watt
11.26

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms R7 370 by a whopping 663% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.445.87
Power efficiency7.25no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTrinidadGB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

R7 370 has 10% better value for money than RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102424064
Core clock speedno data1590 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate62.401,968
Floating-point processing power1.997 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs64752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length152 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed975 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.4
Mantle+-
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 370 11.26
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 85.96
+663%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 370 4495
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 34320
+664%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
−661%
350−400
+661%
1440p57
−602%
400−450
+602%
4K20
−650%
150−160
+650%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.24
+655%
24.47
−655%
1440p2.61
+719%
21.41
−719%
4K7.45
+666%
57.10
−666%
  • R7 370 has 655% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R7 370 has 719% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • R7 370 has 666% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 21−24
−662%
160−170
+662%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−663%
450−500
+663%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 21−24
−662%
160−170
+662%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−629%
350−400
+629%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−663%
450−500
+663%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−650%
270−280
+650%
Fortnite 106
−655%
800−850
+655%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−645%
350−400
+645%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−635%
250−260
+635%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
−663%
290−300
+663%
Valorant 100−105
−650%
750−800
+650%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 21−24
−662%
160−170
+662%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−629%
350−400
+629%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−663%
450−500
+663%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−650%
1200−1250
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Dota 2 75−80
−624%
550−600
+624%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−650%
270−280
+650%
Fortnite 41
−632%
300−310
+632%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−645%
350−400
+645%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−635%
250−260
+635%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
−582%
300−310
+582%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−627%
160−170
+627%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
−633%
220−230
+633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
−643%
260−270
+643%
Valorant 100−105
−650%
750−800
+650%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 21−24
−662%
160−170
+662%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−629%
350−400
+629%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Dota 2 75−80
−624%
550−600
+624%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−650%
270−280
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−645%
350−400
+645%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−644%
290−300
+644%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−627%
160−170
+627%
Valorant 20
−650%
150−160
+650%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30
−633%
220−230
+633%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−650%
150−160
+650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 81
−641%
600−650
+641%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−614%
400−450
+614%
Valorant 120−130
−650%
900−950
+650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−650%
210−220
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−631%
190−200
+631%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
−567%
300−310
+567%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−627%
160−170
+627%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Valorant 55−60
−590%
400−450
+590%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Dota 2 40−45
−650%
300−310
+650%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%

This is how R7 370 and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 661% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 602% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 650% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.26 85.96
Recency 18 June 2015 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 600 Watt

R7 370 has 445.5% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 663.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 370 is a desktop card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 370
Radeon R7 370
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 500 votes

Rate Radeon R7 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 370 or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.