Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R7 370

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 370 with Quadro M2000, including specs and performance data.

R7 370
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 110 Watt
10.85
+12.7%

R7 370 outperforms M2000 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking429454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.213.88
Power efficiency7.239.41
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameTrinidadGM206
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)8 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $437.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

R7 370 has 60% better value for money than Quadro M2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speedno data796 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHz1163 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate62.4055.82
Floating-point processing power1.997 TFLOPS1.786 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length152 mm201 mm
Width2-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed975 MHz1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sUp to 106 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
Mantle+-
CUDA-5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 370 10.85
+12.7%
Quadro M2000 9.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 370 4503
+12.7%
Quadro M2000 3996

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
1440p57
+14%
50−55
−14%
4K20
+25%
16−18
−25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.17
+245%
10.94
−245%
1440p2.61
+235%
8.76
−235%
4K7.45
+267%
27.36
−267%
  • R7 370 has 245% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R7 370 has 235% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • R7 370 has 267% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Fortnite 106
+17.8%
90−95
−17.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Valorant 100−105
+17.6%
85−90
−17.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+14.3%
140−150
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Dota 2 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Fortnite 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Valorant 100−105
+17.6%
85−90
−17.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Dota 2 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Valorant 20
+25%
16−18
−25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30
+25%
24−27
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 81
+15.7%
70−75
−15.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+20%
55−60
−20%
Valorant 120−130
+20%
100−105
−20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Valorant 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

This is how R7 370 and Quadro M2000 compete in popular games:

  • R7 370 is 18% faster in 1080p
  • R7 370 is 14% faster in 1440p
  • R7 370 is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.85 9.63
Recency 18 June 2015 8 April 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 75 Watt

R7 370 has a 12.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro M2000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 46.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R7 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 370 is a desktop card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 370
Radeon R7 370
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 495 votes

Rate Radeon R7 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 216 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 370 or Quadro M2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.