GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R7 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 370 and GeForce GTX 460 SE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 370
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 110 Watt
10.71
+125%

R7 370 outperforms GTX 460 SE by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking454664
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.671.04
Power efficiency7.422.41
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTrinidadGF104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)15 November 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $160

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

R7 370 has 445% better value for money than GTX 460 SE.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024288
Core clock speedno data650 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data104 °C
Texture fill rate62.4031.20
Floating-point processing power1.997 TFLOPS0.7488 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.016x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length152 mm210 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed975 MHz1700 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s108.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Number of display connectorsno data2
Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
DisplayPort support+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 370 10.71
+125%
GTX 460 SE 4.75

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 370 4487
+125%
GTX 460 SE 1992

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
+156%
18−21
−156%
1440p57
+138%
24−27
−138%
4K20
+150%
8−9
−150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.24
+174%
8.89
−174%
1440p2.61
+155%
6.67
−155%
4K7.45
+168%
20.00
−168%
  • R7 370 has 174% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R7 370 has 155% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • R7 370 has 168% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Sons of the Forest 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Fortnite 106
+136%
45−50
−136%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
+138%
16−18
−138%
Sons of the Forest 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Valorant 100−105
+150%
40−45
−150%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+129%
70−75
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Dota 2 75−80
+153%
30−33
−153%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Fortnite 41
+128%
18−20
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+144%
18−20
−144%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
+150%
12−14
−150%
Sons of the Forest 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+150%
14−16
−150%
Valorant 100−105
+150%
40−45
−150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Dota 2 75−80
+153%
30−33
−153%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Sons of the Forest 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+144%
9−10
−144%
Valorant 20
+150%
8−9
−150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30
+150%
12−14
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 81
+131%
35−40
−131%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+137%
27−30
−137%
Valorant 110−120
+136%
50−55
−136%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Sons of the Forest 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
+150%
18−20
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Valorant 55−60
+142%
24−27
−142%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Sons of the Forest 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

This is how R7 370 and GTX 460 SE compete in popular games:

  • R7 370 is 156% faster in 1080p
  • R7 370 is 138% faster in 1440p
  • R7 370 is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.71 4.75
Recency 18 June 2015 15 November 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 150 Watt

R7 370 has a 125.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 36.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R7 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 SE in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 370
Radeon R7 370
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 460 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 553 votes

Rate Radeon R7 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 146 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 370 or GeForce GTX 460 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.