Tesla A100 vs Radeon R7 360

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking514not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.09no data
Power efficiency5.56no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTobagoGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687936
Core clock speedno data1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 million38,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40550.6
Floating-point processing power1.613 TFLOPS17.62 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs48496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length165 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB40 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s1,229 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan+-
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 June 2015 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 260 Watt

R7 360 has 160% lower power consumption.

Tesla A100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 360 and Tesla A100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 360 is a desktop card while Tesla A100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 360
Radeon R7 360
NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 658 votes

Rate Radeon R7 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 237 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.