HD Graphics 510 vs Radeon R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon HD 7730 Radeon HD 7750 Radeon HD 7770 Radeon HD 8730 OEM Radeon HD 8740 OEM Radeon HD 8760 OEM Radeon R7 250E Radeon R7 250X Radeon R7 350 Radeon R7 450 OEM Radeon R9 255 OEM Radeon RX 540 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 505 HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 515 HD Graphics 520 HD Graphics 530

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 350 with HD Graphics 510, including specs and performance data.

R7 350
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
5.53
+246%

R7 350 outperforms HD Graphics 510 by a whopping 246% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

R7 350 R7 350
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking613966
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.017.43
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameCape VerdeSkylake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 July 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51296
Core clock speed800 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate25.6010.80
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs3212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.53 1.60
Recency 6 July 2016 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

R7 350 has a 245.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.

HD Graphics 510, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R7 350 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 510 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 510 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
Intel HD Graphics 510
HD Graphics 510
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7770 Radeon HD 7770
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510
vs
HD 7610M Radeon HD 7610M
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
vs
RTX 4070 RTX 4070
Tesla M10 Tesla M10
vs
GTX 1660 GTX 1660
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
R7 Mobile Graphics R7 Mobile Graphics
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RTX 3080 RTX 3080
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
ATI X1650 XT X1650 XT
Tesla V100 DGXS Tesla V100 DGXS
vs
CMP 170HX CMP 170HX
RX 550X 640SP RX 550X 640SP
vs
RTX 4090 RTX 4090
UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 610
vs
Arc A310 Arc A310
Pro 555X Pro 555X
vs
530 Mobile GDDR5 530 Mobile GDDR5
RTX 2080 Ti RTX 2080 Ti
vs
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 491 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 384 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or HD Graphics 510, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.