Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs Radeon R7 350 Fake Card

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameOpalGA10B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2015 (9 years ago)March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed1050 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate25.2020.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.28 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432
Tensor Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4.6 GB/s1067 MHz
Memory bandwidth36.8 GB/s68.29 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 350 Fake Card and Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 Fake Card is a desktop card while Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 350 Fake Card
Radeon R7 350 Fake Card
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 Fake Card on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.