GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon R7 265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
240 240 OEM 250 250 OEM 250E 250X 250XE 260 260X 265 265X OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
950A 950M 950M Mac Edition 960A 960M 965M 965M 4 GB 965M SLI 970M 970M SLI 980 Mobile 980 SLI Mobile 980M 980M SLI 980MX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 265 with GeForce GTX 965M, including specs and performance data.

R7 265
2014, $149
4 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
9.67
+4.7%

R7 265 outperforms 965M by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 265 R7 265
GTX 965M GTX 965M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking489510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.71no data
Power efficiency4.9514.19
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePitcairnGM206S
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 February 2014 (11 years ago)2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Core clock speedno data944 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate59.2073.60
Floating-point processing power1.894 TFLOPS2.355 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6464
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
VGA аnalog display supportno data+
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno data+
HDMI++
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data
GameStream-+
GeForce ShadowPlay-+
GPU Boostno data2.0
GameWorks-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
BatteryBoost-+
Ansel-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 265 9.67
+4.7%
GTX 965M 9.24

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 265 5220
GTX 965M 5536
+6.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−2.2%
46
+2.2%
1440p24−27
−4.2%
25
+4.2%
4K21−24
+0%
21
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.31no data
1440p6.21no data
4K7.10no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+0%
47
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Fortnite 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
+0%
38
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+0%
31
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 77
+0%
77
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 28
+0%
28
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+0%
18
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 34
+0%
34
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 19
+0%
19
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+0%
10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+0%
14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4
+0%
4
+0%

This is how R7 265 and GTX 965M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 965M is 2% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 965M is 4% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.67 9.24
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB

R7 265 has a 4.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R7 265 and GeForce GTX 965M.

Be aware that Radeon R7 265 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 965M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GeForce GTX 965M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 265 Radeon R7 265
vs
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
GTX 965M GeForce GTX 965M
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
R7 265 Radeon R7 265
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
R7 250X R7 250X
vs
Quadro4 750 XGL Quadro4 750 XGL
R7 250X R7 250X
vs
RTX 6000 RTX 6000
R7 250X R7 250X
vs
Radeon 550X 550X
R7 250X R7 250X
vs
Pro 5300 Pro 5300
R7 250X R7 250X
vs
RTX 5080 RTX 5080
R7 265 R7 265
vs
HD 7850M HD 7850M
R7 265 R7 265
vs
ATI HD 5730 HD 5730
R7 265 R7 265
vs
ATI HD 3870 Mac Edition HD 3870 Mac Edition
R7 265 R7 265
vs
ATI HD 3850 HD 3850
R7 265 R7 265
vs
8800 GT 8800 GT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 383 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 116 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 265 or GeForce GTX 965M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.