GeForce 6200 TurboCache vs Radeon R7 265

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking402not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation1.68no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code namePitcairnNV44 B2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 February 2014 (10 years ago)15 December 2004 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data
Current price$242 (1.6x MSRP)$100

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate59.201.400
Floating-point performance1,894 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length210 mm165 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s4 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
DDMA audio+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkanno dataN/A
Mantle-no data

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 13 February 2014 15 December 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 265 and GeForce 6200 TurboCache. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265
NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache
GeForce 6200 TurboCache

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 346 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.