Quadro FX 3400 vs Radeon R7 250XE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameCape VerdeNV45
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 August 2014 (10 years ago)28 June 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed860 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt101 Watt
Texture fill rate34.405.600
Floating-point processing power1.101 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1616
TMUs4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 August 2014 28 June 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 101 Watt

R7 250XE has an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 26.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 250XE and Quadro FX 3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 250XE is a desktop card while Quadro FX 3400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 250XE
Radeon R7 250XE
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3400
Quadro FX 3400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 250XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.