Radeon RX 5600 OEM vs R7 250

Place in the ranking	808	174
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.10	no data
Power efficiency	2.89	14.78
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Oland	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)	21 January 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$89	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2048
Core clock speed	no data	1130 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.20	199.7
Floating-point processing power	0.8064 TFLOPS	6.39 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	64
TMUs	24	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	N/A	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1150 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 250 2.73

RX 5600 OEM 32.21
+1080%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 250 1049

RX 5600 OEM 12383
+1080%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1058%

220−230
+1058%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

4.68

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −1000%	110−120 +1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Elden Ring	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −1000%	110−120 +1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1054%	150−160 +1054%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −1000%	110−120 +1000%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −1000%	110−120 +1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Dota 2	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Elden Ring	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −1025%	180−190 +1025%
Fortnite	14−16 −1033%	170−180 +1033%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1054%	150−160 +1054%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −1060%	290−300 +1060%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −1000%	110−120 +1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −1000%	110−120 +1000%
World of Tanks	45−50 −1022%	550−600 +1022%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −1000%	110−120 +1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Dota 2	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −1025%	180−190 +1025%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1054%	150−160 +1054%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −1060%	290−300 +1060%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Elden Ring	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −1058%	220−230 +1058%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
World of Tanks	18−20 −1067%	210−220 +1067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Valorant	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −1025%	180−190 +1025%
Elden Ring	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1033%	170−180 +1033%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1025%	90−95 +1025%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1033%	170−180 +1033%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Dota 2	16−18 −1025%	180−190 +1025%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Fortnite	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Valorant	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%

This is how R7 250 and RX 5600 OEM compete in popular games:

RX 5600 OEM is 1058% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.73	32.21
Recency	8 October 2013	21 January 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt

R7 250 has 100% lower power consumption.

RX 5600 OEM, on the other hand, has a 1079.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 250 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.