Quadro K2000M Embedded vs Radeon R7 240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking811not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameOlandEXK107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (10 years ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$69 no data
Current price$109 (1.6x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Boost clock speed780 MHz1058 MHz
Number of transistors950 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate14.0033.86
Floating-point performance499.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 240 and Quadro K2000M Embedded compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsN/Ano data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz3.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.0 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkanno dataN/A
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 22 March 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 240 and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 240 is a desktop card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 240
Radeon R7 240
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1085 votes

Rate Radeon R7 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.