P106-100 vs Radeon R6 (Mullins)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R6 (Mullins) with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

R6 (Mullins)
2014
0.64

P106-100 outperforms R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 2519% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1197322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.25
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameMullinsGP106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)19 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281280
Core clock speed500 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1709 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data136.7
Floating-point processing powerno data4.375 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2500%
130−140
+2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2445%
280−290
+2445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2400%
750−800
+2400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2500%
130−140
+2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2445%
280−290
+2445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2400%
750−800
+2400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2500%
130−140
+2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2445%
280−290
+2445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2500%
260−270
+2500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2400%
750−800
+2400%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 16.76
Recency 29 April 2014 19 June 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm

P106-100 has a 2518.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R6 (Mullins) is a notebook card while P106-100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Radeon R6 (Mullins)
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R6 (Mullins) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 144 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.