Quadro P2200 vs Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.45
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameSpectre SLGP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 September 2014 (10 years ago)10 June 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561280
Core clock speed626 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed847 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors2,410 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate10.02119.4
Floating-point processing power0.3205 TFLOPS3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs840
TMUs1680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared5 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1251 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data200.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (6.0)6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.2.1701.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 September 2014 10 June 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 75 Watt

R5 Mobile Graphics has 341.2% lower power consumption.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics and Quadro P2200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics is a notebook card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 355 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.