Radeon R2 Graphics vs R5 M430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking903not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameMarsBeema
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2016 (8 years ago)27 February 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320128
Core clock speed955 MHz351 MHz
Number of transistors690 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown15 Watt
Texture fill rate17.102.808
Floating-point performance659.2 gflops179.2 gflops
Floating-point performance0.5472 gflops0.08986 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1746 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.21.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2016 27 February 2015

R5 M430 has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M430 and Radeon R2 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M430 is a notebook card while Radeon R2 Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M430
Radeon R5 M430
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Radeon R2 Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 353 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 439 votes

Rate Radeon R2 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.