ATI Graphics Ultra + vs Radeon R5 M430

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking938not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)no data
GPU code nameExoMach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)1 January 1992 (32 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed1030 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate20.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s80.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)None
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 1 January 1992
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 800 nm

R5 M430 has an age advantage of 24 years, a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M430 and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M430 is a notebook card while Graphics Ultra + is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M430
Radeon R5 M430
ATI Graphics Ultra +
Graphics Ultra +

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 389 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.