A100 PCIe 80 GB vs Radeon R5 M335

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking998not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameExoGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date21 October 2015 (9 years ago)28 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3206912
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed1070 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1070 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors690 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown250 Watt
Texture fill rate21.40609.1
Floating-point processing power0.6848 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs8160
TMUs20432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB80 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s2,039 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 October 2015 28 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

A100 PCIe 80 GB has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M335 and A100 PCIe 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M335 is a notebook card while A100 PCIe 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M335
Radeon R5 M335
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
A100 PCIe 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 141 vote

Rate Radeon R5 M335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 68 votes

Rate A100 PCIe 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.