ATI FirePro M5800 vs Radeon R5 M330

Place in the ranking	973	1002
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.94	3.82
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Exo	Madison
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	1 March 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	400
Compute units	5	no data
Core clock speed	955 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	690 million	627 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	26 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.60	13.00
Floating-point processing power	0.6592 TFLOPS	0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	20	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	51.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	Not Listed	1.2
Vulkan	+	N/A
Mantle	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−133%

21
+133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Dota 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Fortnite	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7 +0%	7−8 +0%
World of Tanks	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Dota 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Valorant	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how R5 M330 and ATI M5800 compete in popular games:

ATI M5800 is 133% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the R5 M330 is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

R5 M330 is ahead in 13 tests (30%)
there's a draw in 30 tests (70%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.55	1.44
Recency	5 May 2015	1 March 2010
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	26 Watt

R5 M330 has a 7.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R5 M330 and FirePro M5800.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M330 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M5800 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.