Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon R5 M320

Place in performance ranking	1031	53
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	no data	9.65
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Exo UL/ULT/ULP	TU102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	7 May 2015 (8 years old)	13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$9,999
Current price	no data	$3230 (0.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	4608
Compute units	5	no data
Core clock speed	855 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	855 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	690 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	unknown	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.10	509.8
Floating-point performance	547.2 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R5 M320 and Quadro RTX 8000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	16 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
Mantle	+	no data
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M320 1.15

RTX 8000 50.01
+4249%

Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms Radeon R5 M320 by 4249% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R5 M320 444

RTX 8000 19370
+4263%

Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms Radeon R5 M320 by 4263% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−4233%

130−140

+4233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −3789%	350−400 +3789%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4233%	130−140 +4233%
Hitman 3	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −4233%	130−140 +4233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −4186%	300−310 +4186%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −3789%	350−400 +3789%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4233%	130−140 +4233%
Hitman 3	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −4233%	130−140 +4233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −4186%	300−310 +4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4150%	170−180 +4150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4233%	130−140 +4233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4150%	170−180 +4150%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −4233%	130−140 +4233%
Hitman 3	4−5 −4150%	170−180 +4150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3650%	300−310 +3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −4100%	210−220 +4100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −4150%	85−90 +4150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −4150%	85−90 +4150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Hitman 3	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −4186%	300−310 +4186%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 −4233%	130−140 +4233%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −4100%	210−220 +4100%