Tesla V100 FHHL vs Radeon R5 M240

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1064not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameJetGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 September 2014 (10 years ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3205120
Core clock speed1000 MHz937 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1290 MHz
Number of transistors690 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60412.8
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs20320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedHBM2
Maximum RAM amount0 MB16 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data810 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s829.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2014 27 March 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

Tesla V100 FHHL has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 and Tesla V100 FHHL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook card while Tesla V100 FHHL is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M240
Radeon R5 M240
NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
Tesla V100 FHHL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 52 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 9 votes

Rate Tesla V100 FHHL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.