Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics vs R5 M230
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R5 M230 and Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics outperforms R5 M230 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1090 | 1059 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) |
GPU code name | Jet | no data |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 January 2014 (11 years ago) | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 736 |
Compute units | 5 | no data |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 655 / 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 690 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | unknown | no data |
Texture fill rate | 17.10 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 0.5472 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 8 | no data |
TMUs | 20 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Eyefinity | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | + | - |
HD3D | + | - |
PowerTune | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
ZeroCore | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 11 | 11 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
OpenCL | Not Listed | no data |
Mantle | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 9
−11.1%
| 10−11
+11.1%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Fortnite | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 1−2 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
World of Tanks | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
World of Tanks | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Valorant | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Valorant | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how R5 M230 and HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:
- HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics is 11% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics is 25% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics is ahead in 9 tests (26%)
- there's a draw in 26 tests (74%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.08 | 1.20 |
Recency | 7 January 2014 | 15 May 2012 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
R5 M230 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics, on the other hand, has a 11.1% higher aggregate performance score.
The Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M230 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.