UHD Graphics 710 vs Radeon R5 (Carrizo)

Place in the ranking	920	791
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Carrizo	Alder Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 June 2015 (9 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	128
Core clock speed	no data	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	2410 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-35 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	10.40
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.3328 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	Ring Bus
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	no data	System Shared
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−50%

6−7
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Hitman 3	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Hitman 3	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Hitman 3	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−50%

6−7
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−40%

7−8
+40%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

+0%

1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−33.3%

4−5
+33.3%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.84	2.85
Recency	4 June 2015	4 January 2022
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	15 Watt

R5 (Carrizo) has 25% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 710, on the other hand, has a 54.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Carrizo) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Carrizo) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 710 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.