GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R5 (Carrizo)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 (Carrizo) with GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

R5 (Carrizo)
2015
12 Watt
1.69

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms R5 (Carrizo) by a whopping 3105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking96252
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data77.91
Power efficiency3.6825.79
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCarrizoAD106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2015 (10 years ago)18 May 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564352
Core clock speedno data2310 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2535 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data344.8
Floating-point processing powerno data22.06 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Coresno data34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Fortnite 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−3011%
280−290
+3011%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
Valorant 35−40
−3094%
1150−1200
+3094%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−3094%
1150−1200
+3094%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Dota 2 20−22
−2900%
600−650
+2900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Fortnite 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−3011%
280−290
+3011%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%
Valorant 35−40
−3094%
1150−1200
+3094%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Dota 2 20−22
−2900%
600−650
+2900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−3011%
280−290
+3011%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%
Valorant 35−40
−3094%
1150−1200
+3094%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−3043%
220−230
+3043%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−2841%
500−550
+2841%
Valorant 10−12
−3082%
350−400
+3082%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2900%
450−500
+2900%
Valorant 9−10
−3011%
280−290
+3011%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 54.17
Recency 4 June 2015 18 May 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 160 Watt

R5 (Carrizo) has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 3105.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Carrizo) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Carrizo) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 11790 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Carrizo) or GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.