Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
HD 6770M vs R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Combined performance score
HD 6770M outperforms R5 (Bristol Ridge) by 2% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 796 | 791 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 0.31 |
Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | Bristol Ridge | Whistler-XT |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 June 2016 (7 years old) | 4 January 2011 (13 years old) |
Current price | $53 | $243 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 480 |
Core clock speed | no data | 675 / 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 3100 Million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12-45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 17.40 |
Floating-point performance | no data | 696.0 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and Radeon HD 6770M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Interface | no data | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
Vulkan | no data | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
HD 6770M outperforms R5 (Bristol Ridge) by 2% in our combined benchmark results.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
R5 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms HD 6770M by 30% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
R5 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms HD 6770M by 31% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 21−24
−9.5%
| 23
+9.5%
|
Full HD | 12
−100%
| 24
+100%
|
1200p | 10−12
−20%
| 12
+20%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 11
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
This is how R5 (Bristol Ridge) and HD 6770M compete in popular games:
900p resolution:
- HD 6770M is 9.5% faster than R5 (Bristol Ridge)
1080p resolution:
- HD 6770M is 100% faster than R5 (Bristol Ridge)
1200p resolution:
- HD 6770M is 20% faster than R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R5 (Bristol Ridge) is 83.3% faster than the HD 6770M.
- in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 6770M is 50% faster than the R5 (Bristol Ridge).
All in all, in popular games:
- R5 (Bristol Ridge) is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- HD 6770M is ahead in 11 tests (21%)
- there's a draw in 40 tests (77%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 2.43 | 2.49 |
Recency | 1 June 2016 | 4 January 2011 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 35 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and Radeon HD 6770M. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.