Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand vs R5 (Bristol Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking902not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.82no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeWhistler
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)28 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384480
Core clock speedno data485 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors3100 Million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data11.64
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data48 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 28 March 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 20 Watt

R5 (Bristol Ridge) has an age advantage of 4 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
AMD Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand
Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 26 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) or Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.