UHD Graphics 730 vs Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.
UHD Graphics 730 outperforms R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) by a whopping 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1130 | 725 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 99 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 19.16 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.1 (2014) | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | Beema | Raptor Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (11 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | 1550 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 18.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.5952 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 6 |
| TMUs | no data | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Motherboard Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 6
−250%
| 21−24
+250%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Fortnite | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−250%
|
21−24
+250%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−233%
|
30−33
+233%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−275%
|
120−130
+275%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 24−27
−280%
|
95−100
+280%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−267%
|
55−60
+267%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Fortnite | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−250%
|
21−24
+250%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−233%
|
30−33
+233%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−250%
|
21−24
+250%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−275%
|
120−130
+275%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−267%
|
55−60
+267%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−250%
|
21−24
+250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−233%
|
30−33
+233%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−250%
|
21−24
+250%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−275%
|
120−130
+275%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 5−6
−260%
|
18−20
+260%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−250%
|
21−24
+250%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 4−5
−250%
|
14−16
+250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dead Island 2 | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−275%
|
60−65
+275%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−260%
|
18−20
+260%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dead Island 2 | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
This is how R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) and UHD Graphics 730 compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 730 is 250% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.04 | 4.03 |
| Recency | 29 April 2014 | 3 January 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics 730 has a 287.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
