Radeon RX 5700 vs R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) with Radeon RX 5700, including specs and performance data.

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
2014
1.08

RX 5700 outperforms R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) by a whopping 3361% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1088125
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.75
Power efficiencyno data14.25
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameBeemaNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282304
Core clock speedno data1465 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data180 Watt
Texture fill rateno data248.4
Floating-point processing powerno data7.949 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data268 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) 1.08
RX 5700 37.38
+3361%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) 764
RX 5700 31470
+4019%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) 2698
RX 5700 91993
+3310%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) 539
RX 5700 23746
+4306%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) 3317
RX 5700 132911
+3907%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) 36807
RX 5700 489113
+1229%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6
−1800%
114
+1800%
1440p1−2
−6800%
69
+6800%
4K1−2
−4000%
41
+4000%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.06
1440pno data5.06
4Kno data8.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2700%
84
+2700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1440%
77
+1440%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2450%
102
+2450%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75
+2400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11100%
112
+11100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4850%
99
+4850%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 288
Hitman 3 5−6
−1420%
76
+1420%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2162%
294
+2162%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−11200%
113
+11200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1843%
130−140
+1843%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−709%
259
+709%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2500%
130
+2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2200%
92
+2200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2133%
67
+2133%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8900%
90
+8900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4400%
90
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 276
Hitman 3 5−6
−1400%
75
+1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2138%
291
+2138%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−9700%
98
+9700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−2400%
175
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−609%
75−80
+609%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−659%
243
+659%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1100%
60
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1600%
68
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1833%
58
+1833%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6300%
64
+6300%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 118
Hitman 3 5−6
−1360%
73
+1360%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−815%
119
+815%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−2114%
155
+2114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−727%
91
+727%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−81.3%
58
+81.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−10100%
102
+10100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−10100%
102
+10100%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−7200%
73
+7200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5000%
51
+5000%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−5100%
52
+5100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−686%
55
+686%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2225%
93
+2225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 50−55
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−4780%
244
+4780%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1650%
70
+1650%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 39

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 31
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 26
Far Cry 5 0−1 26

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1650%
35
+1650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 97
+0%
97
+0%
Battlefield 5 180
+0%
180
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+0%
80
+0%
Battlefield 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 77
+0%
77
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+0%
53
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 267
+0%
267
+0%
Metro Exodus 94
+0%
94
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108
+0%
108
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Hitman 3 39
+0%
39
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 116
+0%
116
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70
+0%
70
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 11
+0%
11
+0%

This is how R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) and RX 5700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is 1800% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 is 6800% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 is 4000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5700 is 11200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is ahead in 43 tests (67%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (33%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.08 37.38
Recency 29 April 2014 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

RX 5700 has a 3361.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1799 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.