Radeon R8 M535DX vs R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) and Radeon R8 M535DX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
2014
0.99

R8 M535DX outperforms R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1159997
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameBeemaMeso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 April 2014 (11 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128320
Core clock speedno data780 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz891 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data17.82
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5702 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data20
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6
−50%
9−10
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Valorant 30−35
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Valorant 30−35
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Valorant 30−35
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) and R8 M535DX compete in popular games:

  • R8 M535DX is 50% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 1.60
Recency 29 April 2014 18 April 2017

R8 M535DX has a 61.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The Radeon R8 M535DX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
AMD Radeon R8 M535DX
Radeon R8 M535DX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 34 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M535DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) or Radeon R8 M535DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.