Radeon HD 8330E vs R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) and Radeon HD 8330E, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
2014
0.99
+57.1%

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) outperforms HD 8330E by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11581255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.22
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameBeemaKalindi
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 April 2014 (11 years ago)23 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128128
Core clock speedno data497 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.976
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1272 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6
+100%
3−4
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Valorant 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Valorant 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Valorant 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) and HD 8330E compete in popular games:

  • R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) is 100% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 0.63
Recency 29 April 2014 23 April 2013

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8330E in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
AMD Radeon HD 8330E
Radeon HD 8330E

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) or Radeon HD 8330E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.