HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) vs Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) outperforms HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1100 | 1311 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 (2014) | Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011) |
GPU code name | Beema | Sandy Bridge |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | 1 May 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 6 |
Core clock speed | no data | 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 10.1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
- Other tests
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 6
−16.7%
| 7
+16.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
Atomic Heart | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Atomic Heart | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+23.1%
|
24−27
−23.1%
|
Atomic Heart | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 24−27
+150%
|
10
−150%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+23.1%
|
24−27
−23.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+23.1%
|
24−27
−23.1%
|
Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
+233%
|
3−4
−233%
|
Valorant | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Fortnite | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) compete in popular games:
- HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is 17% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) is 233% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) is ahead in 25 tests (89%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (11%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.93 | 0.30 |
Recency | 29 April 2014 | 1 May 2011 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) has a 210% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.