R5 435 OEM vs RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
 
not rated
Architecture
GCN 1.0
 
GCN 5.0
GPU code name
Hainan
 
Vega 10
Market segment
Desktop
 
Desktop
Launch date
30 June 2016 (4 years ago)
 
7 August 2017 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
 
$699
Price now
no data
 
$246

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
 
4096
Core clock speed
1030 MHz
 
1408 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
 
1668 MHz
Number of transistors
690 million
 
12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
50 Watt
 
345 Watt
Texture fill rate
20.60
 
427.0
Floating-point performance
659.2 gflops
 
14,336 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Length
no data
 
282 mm
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
2x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
DDR3
 
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
 
8 GB
Memory bus width
64 Bit
 
2048 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
 
1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth
16 GB/s
 
483.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
 
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI
+
 
+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 (11_1)
 
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
 
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
 
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
 
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
1.1.125

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R5 435 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
no data
 
33.1 Mh/s

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM

Lower power consumption (50W vs 345W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Much newer (7 August 2017 vs 30 June 2016)

Wider memory bus (2048 vs 64 bit)

More pipelines (4096 vs 320)

Higher memory bandwidth (483.8 vs 16 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.