Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 vs Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	1031	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code name	Stoney Ridge	Cedar Trail
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	1 November 2011 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	4
Boost clock speed	600 MHz	640 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Shared memory	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12 (FL 12_0)

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 June 2016	1 November 2011
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---