GeForce 7300 GT vs Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1063not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.57no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeG73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)15 May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data177 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt24 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.800
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data325 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 15 May 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 24 Watt

R4 (Stoney Ridge) has an age advantage of 10 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) and GeForce 7300 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook card while GeForce 7300 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT
GeForce 7300 GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 123 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 173 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.