Redwood vs Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	1103	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN 1.1 (2014)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Beema/Mullins	Redwood
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	29 April 2014 (10 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	400
Core clock speed	350 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	686 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	627 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Shared memory	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.0
OpenGL	no data	4.4
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	N/A

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography

28 nm

40 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---