RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) with RTX 4500 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

R3 (Mullins/Beema)
2014
0.77

RTX 4500 Ada Generation outperforms R3 (Mullins/Beema) by a whopping 8655% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking121424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.72
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBeema/MullinsAD103
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 April 2014 (12 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1287680
Core clock speed350 MHz2070 MHz
Boost clock speed686 MHz2580 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data210 Watt
Texture fill rateno data619.2
Floating-point processing powerno data39.63 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cacheno data7.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−8567%
1300−1350
+8567%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
Valorant 27−30
−8521%
2500−2550
+8521%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−8471%
1800−1850
+8471%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%
Dota 2 12−14
−8362%
1100−1150
+8362%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Valorant 27−30
−8521%
2500−2550
+8521%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%
Dota 2 12−14
−8362%
1100−1150
+8362%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Valorant 27−30
−8521%
2500−2550
+8521%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−8567%
260−270
+8567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%

1440p
Ultra

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−8471%
1200−1250
+8471%
Valorant 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−8400%
170−180
+8400%

This is how R3 (Mullins/Beema) and RTX 4500 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 8567% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 67.41
Recency 29 April 2014 9 August 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 4500 Ada Generation has a 8655% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4500 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 43 votes

Rate Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 27 votes

Rate RTX 4500 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) or RTX 4500 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.